Thursday, March 9, 2023

Prepare Warp Drive


  The tension which has built in the plot-lines of western political control-narratives is almost unbearable at this point. The political control-narratives have lost traction and are losing adherents among the semi-faithful partisans. They are back-sliding in deeply rutted mud. They will be replaced when a broadly acceptable control-narrative has been composed to replace them. Any new control-narrative will really have to look like a thorough repudiation of the failed control-narratives.   Disgust is growing. Disgust looks like it is actively being driven into a crescendo-peak this week. I presume that disgust and scorn are being carefully monitored on social media, that all developing trends are being carefully tracked. 
  The strongest trends developing in social media are the ones which may become parts of the new control-narrative. (I don't engage on social-media. I'm in as much of a rabbit-hole as I can manage, already.)
  Signs of control-narrative reconsideration have been signaled since late last year. When Henry Kissinger writes an article advocating a different direction for US foreign policy it is a signal. Henry Kissinger has represented Rockefeller interests since around 1950, when they discovered his talent and began cultivating his career advancement in US foreign policy. I was struck in mid December by the simultaneous public positions taken by Kissinger, Col. (USA Ret.) Douglas Macgregor, and the interview of Tucker Carlson by Tulsi Gabbard, which I detailed here 
  Kissinger said the US was missing a narrow window of opportunity to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine, and gave the example of Woodrow Wilson's loss of that same opportunity in the summer of 1916, which led to millions of more deaths in the trenches by the end of that year, and the loss of the historic moment. Kissinger explicitly  made this point to the Biden regime.
  Colonel Macgregor came out and detailed that a change in the imperial-court in Washington might be the appropriate way to make a sea-change in US foreign (war) policy, and gradually built the historic case for it, before making his mesage clear in the last few minutes. 
  Tucker Carlson and Tulsi Gabbard had a comfortable interview together, and both began by establishing in the first few minutes that they saw their lives as following an important destiny, and being busy doing so until they should die. It was not moribund, but clearly urgent, and seemed heroic to me.
  I took this to be a form of messaging, with the message being that the current political operations were seen to be flawed by Rockefeller interests, which are elite interests, and never isolated. Alternatives were being considered, and that public debate on alternatives would be permitted to openly take place. 
  Since then we have seen the media gradually allowing the advance of alternative interpretations of reality, interpretations which threaten the weakest aspects of the COVID/vaccine/lockdown/electronic-health-pass narrative, as well as the brave-Ukraine-beating-Russian-monstor war-narrative. 
  The political-consensus which will be necessary for a country like the US to act cohesively, to adapt to rapid and pervasive change, will need to arise organically, not be handed down from above. We seem to be at the end of the enginnering of "reality" in the face of a rapidly evolving actual-reality which is shockingly different. This ilike the paradigm shift that I remember in American politics, which arose out of the 1968 Tet-Offensive in Vietnam. Suddenly Americans saw Vietcong in every city and village attacking Americans and South Vietnamese soldiers, often taking towns, cities and regions, and Walter Cronkite wondered if we had really been told the whole truth about the war. My dad had just gotten back from Vietnam. I was almost 10. I already knew it wasn't true, but it quickly became common-knowledge tin the US, that the US was losing the war in Vietnam. LBJ declared that he would not run for re-election, and would not accept nomination.     Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy, who opposed the Vietnam War, were both assassinated, with blame placed on "patsies". There were street riots at the Democratic convention. Richard Nixon announced a secret plan to end the war. Nixon won. Kissinger eventually negotiated "Peace with honor". Later he peeled the Chinese Communists away from the Russian Communists, a tremendous and bloodless strategic accomplishment for US foreign policy.

  The historical transition we are now entering does not have a formed control-narrative yet, neither for the US, nor for "the west". We can take part in forming this "noble lie" (Plato), which is the self image of any society. This is not cynicysm on my part. We can keep demanding truth and justice, while advocating moderation in this approach, not revenge, but some form of justice which can unify society. What I mean by that is Truth and Reconciliation in that order, which will necessitate broad, open and just recompense, which I discussed yesterday.
  The risk I see is that when enough blame has been placed for COVID-vaccine-deaths, losing the war in Ukraine, and the broad western "alliance" which pays tribute to "US interests" through the gloobal $US financial system, then we will be at a decision-point. Well "we" be induced to kill for retribution? That sword can be turned against anybody, once it is unsheathed. Who directs the killing? We can assume that those in the highest positions of power, who now direct wars and global thefts, have good plans to maintain their positions. We might see how far up the hierarchy the blame moves. The people who gave shots did not know what they were doing. Gates and Fauci presumably did know. The Philippines has put out an arrest warrant for Gates for mass murder by vaccines. Public response to that in various contries is certainly being closely tracked. Joe Biden is clearly expendible. Schumer, Pelosi and McConnell can step-down for their teams. Pfizer, Moderna, their CIA and DARPA backers seem like they will have to openly take blame, and give up scapegoats in public, but will they be restructured? 
How far will this limited-hangout have to go before the American public is satisfied that the swamp-has-been-drained?
  What about restitution? Will taxpayers pay other taxpayers for dead relatives? When the bubble bursts and most notional wealth in retirements and investments goes POOF, who will be seen to still command the remaining real wealth of the world? Will that be visible at all? What mechanisms will provide the minimal support to feed, shelter and transport people, whch are necessary for a society to be productive? The poor can't really get poorer, and much of the upper middle class is probably poised to join them. How much will the real owners be willing to give over to any society, in order to sustain it? Can't they just live in Dubai?
  What the ownership-class has done in the past is to get one group of people to kill off another group of people, rather than all of the people acting to wrest coontrol of wealth from the owners. One threat to oners is other-owners. One group of owners may offer another group of owners up for sacrfice. All the owners have armed forces. At times like this, one group of owners may offer an appealing social-contract to the people of a nation, in return for the allegiance of that polis, which means some of them dying, and all of them engaging in a war against another elite faction. 
  In the Americn Civil War, Northern banking and industry competed with English banking and industry for the plantation output of the rural south, each requiring the cotton for it's mills, and the market for its manufactured products. England offered the south better deals, but the North made war to gain the cotton and dominate the southern markets. (Lincoln only "freed" southern slaves, not northern slaves during the war. That military practice was already thousands of years old.) 
  What will the owners be able to negotiate amongst themselves? Will people in my country, the US, be presented with a choice of owners/masters to support in a war? Will it be a civil-war, maybe an external war? Will Canada or Mexico invade? Probably not. Russia doesn't want to come over here. China would rather just buy property. China might invade Taiwan. That hardly looks like something Americans would be willing to die for. Americans are pretty clearly against getting into a European war, already. Americans have never wanted to be in wars. It took Pearl Harbor and 9/11. Korea and Vietnam carried on from WW-2, but were rejected when the boys came home in coffins and body-bags. The owners mostly gave up on getting Americans to fight in the wars after that.

  You and I have an opportunity right now to seek a fair and equitable solution for society, which will not threaten to kill a group, and will therefore encourage the long process of difficult negotiations, where there will be progressive loss of wealth and power within western nations, but those who still hold a lot of wealth will need to embrace the support of the whole society, rather than turning the people to civil-war against each other. I see the biggest danger in being turned to hating and killing each other. We should always be steering away from that, and seeking ways to gently steer the owners and their upper level political and military courtiers away from that.

​  ​"Great job by Tucker Carlson tonight," Trump wrote on Truth Social following the bombshell video release. "The Unselect Committee of political hacks and thugs has been totally discredited. They knowingly refused to show the videos that mattered. They should be tried for fraud and treason, and those imprisoned and being persecuted should be exonerated and released, now!"

  Luc sent this story from Robert Malone MDs site, which is the declassified documentation from DARPA, from Summer 2021, by a Major USMC in the office of Naval Intelligence, and includes a brief cover letter with this paragraph: 
  I'm unsure whether the significance of what I communicated is understood by those that received the report. Decisions with regards to the vaccines do not appear to be informed by analysis of the documents. The main points being that SARS-CoV-2 matches the SARS vaccine variants the NIH-EcoHealth program was making in Wuhan; that the DOD rejected the program proposal because vaccines would be ineffective and because the spike proteins being inserted into the variants were deemed too dangerous (gain-of-function): and that the DOD now mandates vaccines that copy the spike protein previously deemed too dangerous. To me and to those who informed my analysis, this situation meets gain of function criteria with regards to the vaccines until the toxicity of the spike protein can be investigated. There's also information within the documents about which drugs effectively treat the program's SARS-CoVs.
  Thus why I'm reaching out. I'm trying to help aid leadership grapple with the vaccines and the mandate with as much information as is available. I wanted to push this information your way.  

  Sasha Latypoa has been revealing the documentary trail which shows US DoD ownership of the bioweapon-countermeasure-prototypes, marketed as "vaccines" by Pfizer, Moderna, J&J and others, in "Operation Warp Speed". Her position has recently been misrepresented by others and she clarifies it here. She "knows who did it, but not who gave the orders".
​  ​We have a mass murder/mass injury event ongoing and bodies are piling up. The deaths and injury are the result of the forced injections of “health products” that do not comply with any regulations for pharmaceuticals nor the lists of ingredients or advertised chemical composition. Thus they should be deemed de-facto poison. Even if the manufacturers managed to produce these substances with fidelity to the label and the law, the products would be still extremely dangerous to administer on a mass scale due to numerous toxicities built into their design, which is perfectly well known to the regulators and manufacturers. Albeit, the latter got rid of employees with expertise and conscience to know this in the years immediately preceding “covid success”, and replaced them with diversity hires and software. The needles are in the hands of “nice people from healthcare” who are doing their jobs as commanded by their superiors. I am tracing this organization back, starting from the weapon of murder and assault - the needle.​..
​..The mass injuries and deaths by the mRNA/DNA injections are intentional. They should be investigated as a crime of mass murder and attempted mass murder by poisoning.​..
​..HHS is following the orders of the National Security Council and the DOD as the Chief Operating Officer of the Operation Warp Speed, i.e. the HHS is operating under the military command structure...
​..​The organizational structure that is responsible for the execution of this crime in the US can be described as follows: POTUS=>NSC=>DOD=>HHS=>state and local health authorities => owners/administrators of health delivery settings=>local vaccinators.
​  ​All men and women in positions of authority in the above organizational structure operate treasonously and under the color of law.
What organization is above the treasonous US officials, I can only guess.​..
..I am convinced that there is a centralized global control of this operation due to the perfectly implemented global lockstep procedures and control of ALL governments. US alone cannot do this.
​  ​The DOD is in charge of funding and ordering the injections from complicit pharmaceutical manufacturers, bypassing pharmaceutical regulations, and utilizing opaque defense purchasing systems typically used for weapons manufacture. DOD is in charge of the distribution of injections to the intended targets - the people of the United States.​..​
​..​The pseudo-legal statutory framework that the treasonous men and women are utilizing to commit these crimes has been described in detail by Katherine Watt.

​  There is a prominent opinion, widely held in the halls of power and military hierarchies of European and Middle Eastern (West Asian) countries, that the Earthquake which devastated large parts of Turkey and Syria last month was induced artificially as an act of covert warfare. It is also possible that the solar flare tail which swept across our planet, including that area, days before the earthquake, was responsible in part. These both have the mechanism of solar energy causing cerent flows and heating at fault line, which are already under tension and poised to jump violently. 
  Coronal mass ejection from the sun and HAARP ionospheric manipulation are not mutually exclusive at all. The solar mass ejection sweeping across the earth, during a period of solar maximum activity, with greatly reduced magnetic field strength protecting earth, is the ideal invitation to further weaken the ionospheric resistance to flows of high energy particles.​ I do not know if there was covert military action, but here is an exploration of that possiblity.
​  ​Environmental Modification Techniques (ENMOD) and the Turkey-Syria Earthquake: An Expert Investigation is Required

​  I have lifted the pipeling story links from Ilargi's post at the Automatic Earth today. He made it so easy.​

​  ​Seymour Hersh, the Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist who wrote the expose on the Nord Stream pipelines sabotage last month, brushed off today’s report in The New York Times that blamed the attack on a “pro-Ukrainian group.”
​  ​Hersh’s original story went into detail on how the U.S. and Norway allegdly carried out the elaborate bombing. His theory is that President Joe Biden was concerned Germany would turn back to Russia for its natural gas if there was a cold winter and restart the pipeline. The White House called Hersh’s story completely false.
​  ​The Times’s report cited unnamed U.S. officials who said they reviewed new intelligence about the pro-Ukraine group with no known ties to the Ukrainian government. Ukraine also denied any role in the attack.
​  ​The paper said: The review of newly collected intelligence suggests they were opponents of President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, but does not specify the members of the group, or who directed or paid for the operation.
​  ​Hersh seemed unimpressed with the report and laughed when reached by The Trends Journal. He joked, “I always thought either Somalia or Nepal were behind it.”

China and Hungary have called for a full international investigation into the pipeline attack under the auspices of the United Nations.

​  Moon of Alabama: 
  No. You do not dive down to 80+ meter for an industrial size job, involving the placement of hundreds of pounds of explosives in eight individual charges on very sturdy [and buried] pipelines, from a sparsely manned boat. Such deep dives require special gases, special breathing equipment, special training, a decompression chamber for emergencies and lots of well trained people to maintain all that stuff. [Not to mention the need for a sonar bouy later for detonation]

​  ​German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius has dodged a question about how the Nord Stream sabotage case could influence Western military aid for Kiev if it turns out that pro-Ukrainian groups were behind the Russian gas pipeline blasts...The New York Times reported on the same day, citing US intelligence sources, that a “pro-Ukrainian group” was behind the September 2022 attacks. Pistorius brushed off the claims presented in the reports as “hypothetical” and maintained that the sabotage act might have been aimed at framing Ukraine. The chance of it being a false-flag operation is as “equally high” as the chance of Ukrainians being behind it, the minister said. Berlin has so far not made any investigation results public. Sweden, Denmark, and Germany have “informed the United Nations Security Council that the investigations are ongoing and that there are still no results,” a government spokesman declared on Tuesday.​ 

​  ​This looks like pressure is being applied all around to negotiate an "official story".
​  ​CIA Director William Burns and US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan considered a version of Ukraine’s responsibility for sabotage acts at Nord Stream gas pipelines in October 2022, the Wall Street Journal said, citing unnamed representatives of the US administration.
​  ​The US believes that Ukraine had an opportunity to perform such operation. No data are available at the moment indicating that Ukrainian authorities were involved in sabotage acts, the newspaper said.

​  "We have no armed forces that could defend themselves in the event of a brutal war of aggression", German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius openly warned, openly admitting the​ serious problems of the Bundeswehr.  (Google translate)

​  ​A team of SAS commandoes are reportedly scouring the world for stocks of Russian-calibre artillery shells to refill Ukraine's depleted arsenals.
A British daily newspaper reported that a dozen special forces troopers have been travelling across Africa, the Middle East and Asia along with intelligence agents and Foreign Office officials.
​  ​The group, posing as arms dealers, carry "substantial amounts of cash" to buy up stocks of 122mm-calibre shells — fired by many of the artillery pieces Ukraine inherited from the Soviet Union — on the spot.

​  ​Stocks of ammunition in the UK are now at “dangerously low levels” due to the country giving away supplies to Ukraine, Britain’s Defence Select Committee has now warned.

​  ​US could ‘shift focus’ from Europe to Asia ‘anytime’ – Berlin
​  ​German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius has expressed concern that Europe is relying too much on the US in the area of defense. This means there is pressure on him “at all times,” he admitted during a talk with Germany’s Deutschlandfunk (Dlf) radio broadcaster on Wednesday, adding that Washington’s priorities could always change.

​Unpredictable (not pictured here in vegetable garden)​

No comments:

Post a Comment